From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b666097a0f5f232
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Problem installing win32ada
Date: 1997/03/06
Message-ID: <dewar.857651996@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223528446
References: <33174AC3.41A6@club-internet.fr>
 <E6Ito6.6BK.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Mitch said

<<Yes there's a problem with Win32Ada and gnat 3.09.  You need to
move some pragmas to a place earlier in the source code.>>

Just to clarify, the problem is in Win32Ada, the interface contains illegal
constructs that are correctly diagnosed and rejected by GNAT! (and should
be diagnosed and rejected by any other correct Ada 95 compiler -- in this
respect some earlier versions of GNAT were indeed incorrect, which is how
the problem arose, but at this point the problem is all on Win32Ada's side!