From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e70c13232dc4a26
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: logarithms on ada
Date: 1997/03/06
Message-ID: <dewar.857651407@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223528410
References: <5fcqrs$ius@panther.Gsu.EDU> <dewar.857536154@merv>
 <01bc293c$68597140$d96f1fcc@p5120.bda> <331E0D60.5987@itg-sepg.logicon.com>
 <E6LsLx.JtA@world.std.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob Duff said

<<True, but one would hope that vendor-specific packages contained
comments explaining whether this is (1) a useful non-standard package
we're providing to users, vs. (2) an internal implementation-specific
thing that no user should ever "with".
>>

Indeed, and I am right now editing the sources to add comments, and also
make some packages private that were not private before!