From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,794a4cb8f6cfe39b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Clear Screen
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <dewar.857568670@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223275078
References: <330FE569.29FA@bix.com> <5erk3a$a29@news.cict.fr>
 <dewar.856916794@merv> 	<5f15dg$an@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <dewar.857057973@merv>
 	<EACHUS.97Feb27170902@spectre.mitre.org> <dewar.857270376@merv>
 <EACHUS.97Mar3141338@spectre.mitre.org>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Eachus said

<<   It is very conceivable to me that say Interrupt Entries will be
supported by no validated implementations when the next major revision
occurs, and that they would be removed on that basis.>>

It may be conceivable to you, but it is just wrong! (already there are
compilers which I guess must seem inconceivable -- they support this
useful feature!)