From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,efbcb7a47025db16
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Effort to Port TSG to Ada-95 and How Fast it Ran in Gnat
Date: 1997/03/01
Message-ID: <dewar.857222672@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 222333107
References: <5efjta$jlm@top.mitre.org> <dewar.856443595@merv>
 <331596C5.22B5@elca-matrix.ch>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Mats said

<<>     This is not porting advice, but really programming advice (write
>     code in a correct manner). In particular, missing pragma
>     Elaborate's are instances of bugs in the original code.

or bugs in the language definition ? :-) :-) :-)>>

I see lots of smileys here, but I still do not konw what you are getting
at. Do you think there are ways in which this could have been handled
better, that would have been practical?