From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4651b0d82680c5d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Polymorphism/Inheritence
Date: 1997/02/27
Message-ID: <dewar.857057833@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 221849852
References: <5f0pcc$5b9@news.cps.udayton.edu>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Adam wondered about:

<<After discussing this problem with my professor and with other students,
we are unable to find out why this occurs, especially since it does not
occur in GNAT version 2.06S, only in versions 3.04 and higher.  If anyone
else has experienced this problem, I would be interested in discussing
any possible solutions you have found.>>

The reason that this clear illegality did not get flagged in GNAT 2.06S is
that 2.06 is a VERY old version of GNAT (well over a year old, and at least
7 versions behind the current release), and it lacked some error checks,
that was one of them!