From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1ced5efd53fe6a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Can Ada95 interface with C++?
Date: 1997/02/21
Message-ID: <dewar.856573735@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 220580865
References: <5csvbd$ia2@top.mitre.org> <1997Feb6.130819.1@eisner>
 <dewar.855276105@merv> <tx1bu9rp8sr.fsf@cygnus.com>
 <5ej3fo$15ki@prime.imagin.net>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<(There wasn't an ISO standard for C++ when Ada95 was standardized.
It would have been problematic to define a standard interface to an
unstandardized language.)

Samuel Mize>>


No need to use the past tense, there STILL is no ISO standard for C++