From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,eee47022b0e39dbb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Exception problem Date: 1997/02/19 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 219861362 References: <330A0D25.313@fs2.assist.uci.edu> <01bc1e5e$a43929a0$148c71a5@dhoossr.iquest.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-02-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: David said <> A clearer and more accurate (though equivalent) is that the pointer in the input stream is never moved past the bad character in the first place, so no backing up is needed, i.e. the pointer is moved to the first non-blank, and then is only moved further if valid input is found.