From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,478e1d17253812d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Existence of Ada95 compiler for embedded 80x86?
Date: 1997/02/18
Message-ID: <dewar.856320255@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 219833468
References: <bond-ya023680001802971231460001@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Greg Bond said

<<The GNAT port for DOS does not work reliably for delay statements, and has
no language support for interrupts>>

We have no reports of delay not working in the DOS port, and it seems to
be working in all the tests we have run, so if you have an example of
it not working, you should submit a bug report!

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies