From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1997/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 219497055 References: <01bc1d22$e144fe60$928d389d@miyu> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Sam said <<...we would expect the sizeof( Four ) to be 12. Instead, it most likely contains a single pointer to a table of function pointers, which are shared by all the instances of the class:>> I don't know who "we" is here, but I can't see anyone expecting this, your "instead" is the obvious implementation, and it would surprise me (though certainly not be invalid) if a C++ implementation did anything else!