From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5997b4b7b514f689
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Reading a line of arbitrary length
Date: 1997/02/14
Message-ID: <dewar.855949560@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 218842404
References: <5ds40o$rpo@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <33032AE2.666F@mds.lmco.com>
 <dewar.855848896@merv> <dsmith-1302971702290001@dsmith.clark.net>
 <33047186.463F@mds.lmco.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Rex said

<<What is surprising is the GNAT routine's performance.  Obviously,
my assumption that a stack-to-heap transfer was occurring is
"erroneous".  Generally, there are several stacks:>>

I can't see any stack-to-heap transfers going on in the GNAT code ...