From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d57302f2954365e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Question about base types Date: 1997/02/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 217776823 references: organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-02-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew Heany said <> Generally we find RM references pretty useless except to a rather small group of people who can successfully read the RM. If you can't understand the message in the first place, most people will not be enlightened by an RM reference, except in certain unusual cases. It is interesting that the suggestion to add RM references almost always comes from people who are pretty much Ada experts, and this is NOT the class of people that GNAT messages are aimed at! And no, there is no thought at all of having a switch to display different messages. The thought is a separate utility program.