From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fa7ae7853ce000b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT v3.09 says GNAT bug- but 2.07 didn't. Please HELP!
Date: 1997/01/30
Message-ID: <dewar.854622459@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 213213450
references: <32F06914.3FD7@reading.ac.uk>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


William Berris posted a raw unanalyzed GNAT bug report to CLA. I trust
he read the contents of the bug boxes, particularly the line that says

"| Please submit bug report by email to report@gnat.com                    "

So far, we have not seen the bug report! Generally the only folks likely
to be able to interprete the contents of GNAT bug boxes live at
report@gnat.com. We do NOT take bug reports from CLA, and do not
encourage posting them here. It is sometimes useful to post an analyzed
bug -- "don't do xyz when using compiler bla-bla, because mutter-mutter",
but it is generally not useful to post raw bug reports, and in any
case it is critical to send them to the proper support location, no
matter what compiler you are using!

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies