From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better! Date: 1997/01/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 213018477 references: <5bphq4$5js@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <32E05FAF.47BA@concentric.net> <5buodl$bci@boursy.news.erols.com> <32E2FEC7.2F7B@concentric.net> <6PE5zLpF3RB@herold.franken.de> <32E57E2B.6CB7@epix.net> <32E57FBC.2325@epix.net> <5c4ita$3qs@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <32E6797A.6E21@parcplace.com> organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.object Date: 1997-01-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert said "It is the hallmark of large factorials, that they terminate with lots of zeros. More interesting yet is that regardless of what radix you convert the factorial to, providing the radix is not much larger than the factorialized number, the factorial will *still* terminate in a lot of zeroes." I don't see how you find that interesting, it is transparently obvious that this is the case if you think about it for a moment ...