From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45a4fcaf1b409965 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Recommendations, please Date: 1997/01/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 212167218 references: <32df05a8.9685800@news.lander.es> <1997Jan14.070707.1@eisner> organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <32df05a8.9685800@news.lander.es>, lektu@lander.es (Juanma Barranquer o) writes: > > I'm thinking of buying a commercial Ada compiler for Windows 95 (I've > tasted GNAT and it's too dry for my tastes), and my budget goes only > to $1,000 - $1,500. Now I know that's the middle-low range, as Ada > compilers go, but anyway, is there any product I should look to? Well I am not quite sure what to make of "too dry", since wetness or dryness is not a characteristic that I have thought of as being associated with programming languages (although i would have unbderstood what you meant it you said GNAt was "all wet") :-) Anyway, you may want to take another look at GNAT when the new version of GNAT for NT is publically released which should be quite soon now. The current public version (3.04a) is at this stage very out of date.