From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/12
Message-ID: <dewar.853113352@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 209436047
references: <97011215221883@psavax.pwfl.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Marin said

"    I liked the book, but I thought there was a certain sort of
    naivete to some of the concepts - especially this one. Yes, there
    is a large class of programs that can be built by a coding
    genius in a garage a lot better/faster/cheaper than by a team of
    average programmers sitting in Dilbert cubicles and forced to
    attend endless status meetings, etc. Especially where one needs to
    get particularly "creative" in inventing new and interesting
    solutions to a problem."


Sounds like you are reacting to the quote, and not to the book. The author
never implies that all code can be built in a garage by two people. I think
you must be misremembering what you read?