From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c462e8ad74872a98
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Question on modular types
Date: 1997/01/08
Message-ID: <dewar.852779585@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 208656967
references: <01bbfa96$66d516a0$8d2d5c8b@jerryware> <dewar.852430006@merv>
 <01bbfbf8$4fda7a40$5f2d5c8b@jerryware> <E3LotB.9J9@world.std.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


iRobert Duff said

"Convention to those who have read the RM, and understand that arithmetic
on modular types is always wrap-around arithmetic.  ;-)"


I cannot find anywhere in the RM where it says that unary minus has
wrap around arithmetic semantics, can you point me to the place where
this is said.