From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ?
Date: 1997/01/08
Message-ID: <dewar.852772995@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 208730082
references: <5acjtn$5uj@news3.digex.net> <JSA.97Jan1181506@alexandria>
 <E3I8GL.AuH@research.att.com> <32D11FD3.41C6@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bart said

"You shouldn't bother programmers with inlining. Inlining can be done
automatically by the compiler."

I don't see this is possible across modules without violating the integrity
of separation of specs and implementations.