From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,978f50245fc02645 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Root of a GNAT problem (was: Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation problem Date: 1996/12/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 204498338 references: <58h301$gad@alfali.enst-bretagne.fr> <58h6n2$2hbi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <32AD9D35.4D1@lmtas.lmco.com> <32AE0EDC.4D4B@bix.com> <58m0tk$17ec@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Peter Herman says "Ken Garlington wrote good ideas, too. Does ACT want a parallel organisation caring for non-customers?" We don't have any particular reaction. Certainly people are welcome to do anything they like. The chat@gnat.com list acts a little like this, but generally you can't expect to get real bugs fixed on this list! If you have not joined chat@gnat.com, I recommend you do so, it may meet your needs, particuarly for things like installation problems.