From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,978f50245fc02645
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Root of a GNAT problem (was: Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation
 problem
Date: 1996/12/11
Message-ID: <dewar.850343084@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204498344
references: <dewar.849335191@merv> <58h301$gad@alfali.enst-bretagne.fr>
 <58h6n2$2hbi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <1996Dec9.110039.1@eisner>
 <dewar.850183545@merv> <32AD89D1.16E0@bix.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Tom Moran says

"  I just send the report again on those occasions when there's been no
response after a couple of days.  Getting lost once in e-mail often
happens, but the probability of getting lost twice is low."


Actually, it is probably better to wait more than a couple of days, often
we get a little behind in processing messages from unsupported users,
especially after an event like Tri-Ada and "The Maiden and the Mandates"
absorbs quite a bit of our time :-)