From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,978f50245fc02645
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Root of a GNAT problem (was: Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation
 problem
Date: 1996/12/10
Message-ID: <dewar.850270085@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204498341
references: <dewar.849335191@merv> <58h301$gad@alfali.enst-bretagne.fr>
 <58h6n2$2hbi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <dewar.850182311@merv>
 <32AD9D35.4D1@lmtas.lmco.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"By the way, if such a database were made available, I would strongly
recommend keeping rejected problem reports in there. They can serve as a
very useful FAQ supplement..."

Well people are always very ready to suggest ways that we can spend more
of our time without providing support for that time :-)

Right now, we are not planning any changes in the way we handle our
bug data base, except possibly in response to customer needs. If someone
is interested in funding something more extensive, we would certainly
be willing to consider it!