From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ae5f4553aae9277
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: What's wrong with this syntax?
Date: 1996/12/10
Message-ID: <dewar.850238593@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204497367
references: <32A6FE0F.7902@lmtas.lmco.com> <587aul$hrd@zeus.orl.mmc.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob said

"The code compiled without errors using a Tartan C40 compiler (Ver 5.1).
This was true for whether the 9x options switch was off (Ada 83)
or on (some Ada 95 features available).

Curious.

-Bob"



Not curious, just a bug in the Tartan compiler .... I don't think any
compiler makes the claim of being 100% bug free :-)