From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea40456edaea3d23
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Pascal to Ada translator/ aflex,ayacc GNAT ports
Date: 1996/12/01
Message-ID: <dewar.849445635@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201706431
references: <57htn2$jm8@cnn.Princeton.EDU> <57i8af$p8m@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <57j17b$6pt@news.pacifier.com> <dewar.849267826@merv>
 <01bbde30$7a63d4e0$11208b82@wd> <dewar.849318953@merv>
 <01bbde93$a09ea190$0d208b82@wd> <dewar.849367775@merv>
 <01bbdf5d$da19d820$33208b82@wd>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


wiljan said

"My point is that every translator has certain trade offs. That was also
the case with my pascal to Ada translator."

Sure, that's perfectly reasonable, but in that context, always using the
renaming as the translation of with seems the right choice.