From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,248315f694f8be46
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Win 32 API question.
Date: 1996/12/01
Message-ID: <dewar.849443620@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201703276
references: <57ejdl$fjq@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ian says

"I note that Win 32's, Find_File.... and Find_File_Next... are
very similar to the VMS calls. Does anyone know where I can
get my hands on Ada (THICK) bindings to these. I have need of
them for an accounts package I am working on.
"

Well you can obviously get your hands on an appropriate thin Ada binding,
or trivially make one yourself for just two functions.

When you say you want a thick binding, you are asking for an extra layer
of abstraction, but there again, for just two functions, you can trivially
spin your own abstraction with exactly the design you want.