From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,abd120a1d5231d28
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Looking for a good Ada 95 book
Date: 1996/11/28
Message-ID: <dewar.849188698@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201247552
references: <3290C33B.1772@cse.eng.lmu.edu> <56rc87$lbb@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <dewar.848712351@merv> <577269$86o@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <329BD3A1.1CD7@accessus.net>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Suzanne said

"Hear, Hear!  THat's what pretty printers are for!"

Fine, I know many people react that way, but if you review the thread,
you will see that I posted what I consider some serious objections to the
notion that pretty printers solve this problem, can you address these
objections?