From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f6ad09be517b338c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: LGPL Requirements (was: Selecting Ada95 compiler for MSDOS
 realtime application)
Date: 1996/11/07
Message-ID: <dewar.847398139@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195208479
references: <55rs5t$2a3@nw101.infi.net> <55t2nv$1b5e@mdnews.btv.ibm.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dale Pontius says

"Would this be solved if dynamic linking were used? The GNAT runtime
could be kept in a completely separate file which could be replaced
at will without touching your code. That way there would be no need
to reverse engineer your code."

No, this would not solve anything, but then as I trust previous posts
have made clear there was no problem that needed a solution in the
first place!