From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aeba3d258ec8d495
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Selecting Ada95 compiler for MSDOS realtime application
Date: 1996/11/07
Message-ID: <dewar.847397937@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195208490
references: <327FCD98.40AD@cedar-rapids.net>
 <qw6ohhboyx7.fsf@gargantua.enst.fr>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Maffei <ramaffei@cedar-rapids.net> writes:

Richard> A non-GNAT solution is preferred to avoid any potential
Richard> restrictions/requirements associated with the commercial
Richard> release of software containing GNU libraries.


There are no such restrictions/requirements that would cause you any
difficulty with such commercial release. There are many commercial
proprietary products that are compiled with GNU compilers.

On a number of occasions, I have heard people spreading the impression
that there is a problem here, including some salespeople. They are mistaken,
there is no such problem!