From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f894972725d7613 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Ada strangeness or bug in Gnat? Date: 1996/11/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 195006852 references: <328028AE.757F@direct.ca> <55prap$7q9@arktur.rz.uni-ulm.de> organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-11-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ronald Cole says "I wouldn't posit the correctness of my programs on the basis of the results I get upon running it on this platform." This behavior is not a result of suppsed backend problems in the PA RISC version of GNAT. We have a number of customers using the HP PA RISC port of GNAT, and it seems to be in good shape. This is the current 3.07 version, and it is true that this fixes some problems in the current public release, but these problems show up in quite different ways than the problem at hand, so Ronald's guess that the behavior might be due to backend problems is dubious. We expect the public release of several of the 3.07 versions next week.