From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b4bed4f74b8ac49
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT messages and the not operator (pitfall alert!)
Date: 1996/11/05
Message-ID: <dewar.847247568@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194841306
references: <dewar.846162354@merv> <dewar.846163972@merv>
 <32762A30.D2D@watson.ibm.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Norman said

"I agree this is a nasty one, and Ada as a Second Language explicitly
warns about it (bottom of page 245), as well as about the only slightly
less insidious

   A+B mod C

(which means A + (B mod C))."

I find that completely dubious, apart from the spacing (which would be
a factor even in A+B * C), it seems clear that one expects mod to have
a similar precedence to multiplication or division.