From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8dea6f46dfb95f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Environment variables
Date: 1996/11/02
Message-ID: <dewar.846952448@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194082162
references: <55819q$mql@newslink.runet.edu> <DEMER.96Oct30135844@cdfsun03>
 	<dewar.846730455@merv> <ws94tjbhlg1.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
 	<327A0B58.65C4@gsfc.nasa.gov> <ws9aft1vgse.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Laurent said

'   It's a GNAT extension. Note that, technically speaking, it's legal
for an implementation to provide a completly different
Ada.Command_Line than the one listed in the RM, as per RM-A.15(21):"

This is true, but quite irrelevant. The issue here is providing 
implementation defined grandchildren of Ada, which is always permitted,
without needing to appeal to special provisions.