From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b4bed4f74b8ac49
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT messages and the not operator (pitfall alert!)
Date: 1996/10/29
Message-ID: <dewar.846609496@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 193082295
references: <dewar.846162354@merv> <3275A12F.B8F@svl.trw.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


iCary says

"But, shouldn't the warning be "not expression should be parenthesized"?"

In fact that *is* what the message says in the latest version of GNAT. I
already changed this.