From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3498dd887729ed19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Garbage Collection in Ada
Date: 1996/10/23
Message-ID: <dewar.846048434@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 191448707
references: <01bbb910$f1e73f60$829d6482@joy.ericsson.se>
 	<199610132138291604607@dialup101-6-14.swipnet.se>
 	<1996Oct13.194807.1@eisner> <JSA.96Oct14174741@alexandria>
 	<dewar.845386292@merv> <JSA.96Oct16184237@alexandria>
 	<dewar.845559025@merv> <JSA.96Oct18150702@alexandria>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


iJon Anthony says

"You're being sloppy - you mean I may be part wrong in claiming that
implementing all the annexes may not have had "that level of payback".
I am clearly not wrong in claiming Orbix/Ada offers functionally
everything (and more) than the DSA.  I can guarantee that.  I had the
choice and have opted for the ORB.  Further, I am not wrong in stating
that I don't have this sort of option for GC."

No, that's wrong, they are overlapping capabilities, sure, but it is not
the case that Orbix/Ada offers functoinally all that DSA offers, but i
will let the GLADE DSA folks elaborate on this ...