From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a77baf86c187076a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Garbage collection (was a spinoff of a spinoff of a GA diatribe)
Date: 1996/10/21
Message-ID: <dewar.845939859@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 191070456
references: <9610171549.AA07433@most> <DzL6J8.JG0@world.std.com>
 <54gb7a$nbh@linus.mitre.org>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Michael thinks that performance rquirements should be on the same
level as semantic requirements. This is not an unusual viewpoint,
but I think no one has the foggiest idea how to actually proceed
to do something useful along these lines. Michael, can you point
to an example of what you mean, or is this entirely fantasy at
this stage?