From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Portability of Arithmetic (was: Java vs Ada 95) Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 191066009 references: <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net> <1996Oct15.174526.1@eisner> <32679C86.2FB8@watson.ibm.com> <3268573F.41C6@cray.com> <326BBD70.2131@watson.ibm.com> organization: New York University newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: iNorman said "In the past, there were no machines with 64-bit address spaces; now there are several. As Robert is well aware, several vendors of 64-bit machines have sought to establish a common set of rules about how the C integral types should correspond to 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, and 64-bit integers on 64-bit machines. " Sought and failed so far? no? or has there been progress here that I did not hear about. Last I heard no one could agree.