From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95 (Was Re: Once again,
 Ada absent from DoD SBIR solicitation)
Date: 1996/10/16
Message-ID: <dewar.845506606@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 190001416
references: <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net> <Dz424A.C3C.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 	<ROGOFF.96Oct14095012@sccm.Stanford.EDU> <DzBrFw.IAs@world.std.com>
 <ROGOFF.96Oct16095916@sccm.Stanford.EDU>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"To be fair though, I'll count "portability of arithmetic" as a Java advantage."

Hmmm! I thought that Java left overflow undefined, I don't call that
portable!