From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada
Date: 1996/10/03
Message-ID: <dewar.844373039@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187045396
references: <324219D1.15FFEF33@bright.net> <524sb9$t5g@lex.zippo.com>
 	<529n5f$k68@news.ccit.arizona.edu> <529vd7$h9l@lex.zippo.com>
 	<52eltk$jha@news.ccit.arizona.edu> <52qso0$1b3l@ilx018.iil.intel.com>
 <4vd8z1ze0o.fsf@world.std.com>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I got the following post from GA

G Aharonian: >>>>>>long term viability of Ada            Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:33
-- 16:03 --comp.lang.ada-- 40 MORE+next --help:?--All--

Does this mean that GA has run out of things to say on the subject??? :-)