From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d3a1501d97dab65 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: C to Ada : a piece of code Date: 1996/09/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 180532633 references: <3231732C.2781@virgoa4.in2p3.fr> <01bb9d61$537fe5e0$2b8371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com> <01bb9e40$d0312d80$348371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com> <514lpk$i0m@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <51a30f$co@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "As I found out during my research, it is perfectly possible to add a very efficient garbage collector to GNAT with only some very small changes to the run-time library. Hopefully this situation won't be changed by a small optimization like using virtual origins." Geert, virtual origins are a BIG win for many programs, what makes you say it is a small optimization ...