From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d3a1501d97dab65
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: C to Ada : a piece of code
Date: 1996/09/11
Message-ID: <dewar.842440545@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 179917307
references: <3231732C.2781@virgoa4.in2p3.fr>
 <JSA.96Sep7205717@alexandria><01bb9d61$537fe5e0$2b8371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>
 <JSA.96Sep8202531@alexandria> <01bb9e40$d0312d80$348371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>
 <dewar.842316873@schonberg> <514lpk$i0m@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Geert says

"Since Ada-compilers do not provide garbage collection (sad, but still
true), users depend on being able to add a conservative garbage
collector."

Note that this statement is a bit broad, it should say "some users might
depend in the future on being able add" .... I don't know of anyone
doing this with GNAT today.