From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,39c299e1a336f754
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada for the Mac
Date: 1996/09/10
Message-ID: <dewar.842401705@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 179820103
references: <32237B8F.6DC7@xmission.com> <00001a73+000033a9@msn.com>
 <dewar.841874548@schonberg> <322ED21A.678@thomsoft.com>
 <evans-0809961051540001@ppp21.pgh.net>
 <01bb9e89.5ee38da0$fc899dc0@fielding.east.alsys.com>
 <dewar.842363129@schonberg> <1996Sep10.124132.1@eisner>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Larry said

"But ACT has the advantage of not having to swallow "development costs",
which both means that Neil's doubts remain unchallenged and means that
we have a method to get supported Ada for at least one of the two MacOS
platforms.
"

very interesting, you must know something I do not. It is true that the ATIP-P
is fronting some of the funds for the Mac development, but (a) this is only
partial support, and (b), there is substantial cost sharing in the form of
delivered goods. You should check the contract before making unsupported
statements like this.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies