From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b47b15fda2aeb0b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Two ideas for the next Ada Standard Date: 1996/09/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 179720804 references: <50aao3$3r88@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <50gelc$2le@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <50jk0f$krh@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <50opma$kos@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <5137hi$9oq@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard said "I had actually seen this in a thread earlier this year. (comp.lang.ada _is_ such good value.) However, 'Image is one of the things that would merit suppression: it would be nice to export an enumeration type _as_ an enumeration type without having to provide all the names as strings. " Well pragma Discard_Names comes close to doing what you want. If there is a Discard_Names pragma, then no strings need to be exported.