From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,45abc3b718b20aa3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Two ideas for the next Ada standard
Date: 1996/09/06
Message-ID: <dewar.842062820@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 179023948
references: <5009h5$ir4@netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov> <Dx05yF.Jpo@world.std.com>
 <dewar.841529656@schonberg> <50q1b8$1c0a@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
 <DxC1Lv.BtL@world.std.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob Duff asks

"I'm curious as to the intended syntax of the private part.  Is it just
the stuff after "private"?  So the file starts with some (indented)
declarations?  Quite legal, but a bit ugly, especially since its
semantics depends on its file name (just like in C, heh, heh)."

You know the syntax, it is in the RM, I think you are asking "what is
the intended source representation of the private part", and the answer
is that we have not decided yet.

Probably you need a header line of some kind, but we have not decided
yet.