From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1920d4a6f558148
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Rational vs SunAda
Date: 1996/09/05
Message-ID: <dewar.841979548@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 178812424
references: <322DBF90.3B38@ultranet.com> <qw6zq35b8m6.fsf@gargantua.enst.fr>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Sam said

  "AFAIK, GNAT is not validated yet for Sun because noone paid for
  it. You should contact support@gnat.com (right address ?) to get more
  information about the validation process."

Right, GNAT is not yet validated on Solaris. The reason that Sam gives
is not quite right--it's more a simple matter of priorities and
scheduling.

Our plan is to validate a number of implementations
later this calendar year, including probably the Sun/Solaris port. We
will aim at 100% passage of all tests in the core and *all* optional
special needs annexes.

Our current status is that we are passing 100% of the basic C tests, virtually
all the B tests, and we are about 30 tests short on the Ada 95 C tests (that
figure includes the core and all the special needs annexes). We see no major
problems in passing these last few tests.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies