From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b21d694de03460e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: (no subject given)
Date: 1996/09/05
Message-ID: <dewar.841956102@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 178763950
references: <INFO-ADA%96090309470743@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU>
 <JSA.96Sep4164058@alexandria>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jon Anthony said

"Yes, that was clever and quite nice.  Too bad pragma Assert is not
standard..."

Well too bad in the abstract, but in practice I expect all Ada 95 compilers
will implement pragma Assert.
So it does not make much difference to users.