From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f43e6,d3d1abbae7094b87 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3d1abbae7094b87 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Three releases and rewrite? Date: 1996/08/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 174777268 references: <4utj8s$14q@su102w.ess.harris.com> <4uvm3r$ave@news.csus.edu> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: ": It seems like a rule of thumb for commercial software applications : is that after three major releases (i.e., 1.0, 2.0, 3.0), you : rewrite the application from scratch." I can't think of many examples. In the case of OS/2, it was after one major release that it was rewritten. Word Perfect is on version 6 without a major rewrite. Lots of other products are beyond three major products. So, an interesting hypothesis, but a dearth of supporting data. Yes of course we know about Windows, but one example doth not a rule make!