From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b7566e485e23e171
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Changing discriminants at run-time: erroneous execution?
Date: 1996/08/10
Message-ID: <dewar.839653263@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 173289723
references: <lhmg25z8v2x.fsf@berlin.berlin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <lhmivatq4dz.fsf@berlin.berlin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Andre said

"We got bitten by a yet-unimplemented feature in GNAT; so that the
problem was not reported by the run-time system -- which should
normally happen."

Quite true, although GNAT *did* print a big warning message, which you
ignored! The warnings in GNAT should not usually be ignored :-)