From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab2ba9c5d12b0f12
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Concurrency in Gnat 3.05?
Date: 1996/07/20
Message-ID: <dewar.837901686@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169275332
references: <4sjqte$3mu@masala.cc.uh.edu> <4sr724$4k8@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Michael said

"_Preemptive_ multitasking is NOT required in the Ada 95 core language,
nor is time-slicing."

The first statement is true, the part after the "nor" is misleading, 
because in fact the core has nothing to say about time slicing, but
the real time annex forbids it. I know I have said this before, but
either Mike's newsreader is slow, or it can bare being said again :-)