From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc243f3bb85ffa4f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Exceptions: Are they GOTOs?
Date: 1996/07/20
Message-ID: <dewar.837863774@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169063768
references: <4sjql7$3mu@masala.cc.uh.edu>
 <4sk31v$sih@news1.t1.usa.pipeline.com>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Walter wrote:

"If you will be the only person to maintain the code, use whatever you want;
but, using Goto can cause major problems for seasoned people trying to make
sense of your code."

Walter, did you read the thread? What has this post to do with it (it is
of course true, and would be true for the substitution of practically
any other word for Goto). It certainly has nothing to do with whether
or not exceptions are gotos.

Perhaps it is just a mischievous troll to see if you can get this thread
to degenerated into yet another silly discussion of gotos (which I agre
it is perilously close to -- after all it had a very shaky foundation
to start with :-)