From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,656061a0e71d5157
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: i seach graphick package for ada
Date: 1996/07/15
Message-ID: <dewar.837430164@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 168591898
references: <4sbl2s$3np@mc3.mcnet.ch>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bernard said

"I would make a graphic environment for a recursif program with ada, not ada95,"

Ada *is* Ada95

so presumably you mean Ada 83.

One thing everyone agrees on is to always say Ada 83 rather than Ada in
this newsgroup if the distinction is important. It is also helpful to
say Ada 95 rather than simply Ada if the distinction is important (but
there it can be argued on legalistic grounds that Ada means Ada 95, so
that's a little less of a consensus issue).

I have no idea why recursion should have anything to do with a "graphic
environment". Perhaps you could make your request clearer?