From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53d1d1eed63370ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: compile on a pc to a sparc
Date: 1996/07/10
Message-ID: <dewar.837038930@schonberg>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167758434
references: <4rrivk$naf@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>
 <4s0puh$52a@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Mike said

"You can build a cross-compiler on your OS/2 box if you wish, but this
takes a large amount of disk/time resources and a fair amount of
knowledge. If you've never done it, it will eat up much more of your
time than getting a compiler on the SPARC will."

And I noted the difficulties that come from the non-standard makefiles
in OS/2. That is one of many reasons that I am personally switching
from OS/2 to Win95, it will be much easier for me to be in a more
standard environment gcc-wise.