From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,8ff817fc5c863f82 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: software engineering and the notion of authorship Date: 1996/07/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 167484103 references: <4quk22$78@krusty.irvine.com> <4r059t$2at0@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <4r3bp1$cea@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <4rg3ph$2on4@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <4rjhv6$ilu@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <31E0CF36.FDC@tick.infomatik.uni-stuttgart.de> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.software-eng Date: 1996-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: James Robinson says " If comments and documentation are counted as part of the code I would be amazed to hear that there is a single project of any significant size where it is impossible to tell who wrote the code, considering that writing styles tend to be individual. Especially if the comments go into any depth. :-) " Try looking at the GNAT souces, you may be amazed :-)