From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6ff6ac051491e437 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT Codesize Date: 1996/07/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 164136958 references: <31c8fdd4.5a455349@zesi.ruhr.de> <835637893.1349.0@assen.demon.co.uk> <4r1806$aci@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <836339491.14712.0@assen.demon.co.uk> <836687839.21932.0@assen.demon.co.uk> organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John McCabe said "If you say so - the only efficency advantage I've seen shown is that it reduces the directory lookup time. This is trivial." Not at all, directory lookup time can be quite appreciable if you have very large directories. On some systems, we have found this to be a significant source of slowing down of compilations.